Posts Tagged ‘Trends’

Interviewing, Recruiting & The Web

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

I’m going to add supporting evidence, as to how right on the money an article which has been recirculated and edited/updated in Business Week is, and also add value to the discussion, by adding a point they missed. It was an article on how social media, particularly blogs are changing the business world.

They failed to mention how blogs are changing the interview & recruiting process.

Employers have googled me, and my two blogs. I know because of web developer analytics. Links to my blog have been forwarded around offices in e-mails, again more data from stats. I know which employers spend time on my site, looking at me, and I know which ones don’t, and what posts they have read. Here’s a fun fact, I’ve applied to a job posting where they only want applicants to post a link to their blog, rather than a resume. These kinds of things have impact on decisions made in the recruiting process, and is likely effecting my career as a professional.

If an employer googles me, they will find I have a passion for stocks, an entrepreneurial flare, as well as enjoy writing, reading, and I’m about to graduate from Engineering at Waterloo. If they dig deep enough they will get to read my thoughts, on silly things as well as where else I have interviewed. I don’t care, I’m just being honest. Information is value. All recruiters and HR people should realize that in a formal interview people answer questions in a fashion that is more likely to get them hired. If you think about it, the process needs to be improved. It’s sort of like dating, but you have approximately an hour to decide if you want to date the person (for at least a few more months). And both sides are expected to make this decision quickly and by any means necessary.

Here’s a thought: I want an employer to know as much about me as possible, I don’t want them to make a mistake and hire me into a job where I’m a) not qualified b) won’t be good at or c) have to hide my personal life & interests.

So, I’m laying it out here, I’ve applied to jobs in finance mainly (research/analytical thinking), the Internet (some start-ups), technology (many many diverse jobs here) and others which I am really crossing my fingers for, like Deloitte. Some have been interesting, and some lame. Surprised? You shouldn’t be, I’m talented, educated, and could do many things in many fields, and be equally successful and happy doing them. I’ve only blogged about a fraction of the opportunities I applied to and interviewed for. Employers should be on this, I will when I do any interviewing. I’m waiting for a head hunter to reply to a comment on a post I write and offer me a job. It’s coming.

This next part is important, and leaders should realize this. If somebody is alive in North America and doesn’t have any tracks online, it can mean an array of possibilities (here are a few I could think of):

- They are terrified of stalkers (or the authorities)

- They are lame (ie have no thoughts, ideas, interests, etc.)

- They are liars (ie hide behind a fake profile name, and thus have something to hide)

Hears a tip to level the playing field, when you google them, add the location, or topic they might be found near.

To all employers that I have interviewed with, may one day interview with, or never will because of this: I’m just honest, and if you asked the right questions in an interview, I’d tell you the answers anyway. So in my next interview, just ask me, “What would I get if I googled you?”. Let’s not dance around the “who knows who or what about whom” in the next interview, okay. I promise I’ll ask you the same thing back, if you’re going to be my future boss that is.

Another thing, inferrences and assumptions based on online conversation which are normally rather poor writing, can lead to mistakes. So it’s probably best for both parties to clear up any uncertainty or misinterpretations you found by “digging around” google on your own.

Oh by the way, leaders are already taking this to the next step. I know for a fact, Microsoft and Amazon.com, take bloggers over non-bloggers to interview and then give them offers. I know many people who talk about various interviews they have been through. Some of them are on my blog roll.

Stocks At all Time Highs, Sign Me Up

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

The investing side of me is a culmination of every investment I’ve ever made as well as every investment I’ve ever seen.  I take pleasure in learning from the successful. 

The present value of a lesson learned is infinite.

I’m jumping on the bandwagon with the teachings of two different millionaires I know…a Hawaiian and Albertan Real Estate success story and a trend following entrepreneurial VC fund runner.  Both buy the tops in the markets they operate and sell it to somebody else higher, and don’t think twice if the market looks remotely like it’s about to go sideways.  Although, I’m going to keep the principles I’ve learned to me by other successful investors like Buffett, Sprot and my dad.

So take a look at XRAY, trading at 25x. 

I think there’s got to be a play somewhere on insulation.  Everybody everywhere is trying to improve the efficiency of their homes as energy gets more expensive while the planet gets more polluted.  If I found a company that was operating in that space and trading at all time highs, I’d be all over that…I’ll be looking and will report.

The 7th or 8th guy at Facebook, or was it Winamp, says…

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

I promise I’m not going to blog about UX all the time.

The other day I was at the Hilton listening to a keynote speech given by Chamath Palihapitiya. He was one of the founding partners in Facebook (now VP of marketing), as well as other Internet phenomena like ICQ, and Winamp. By the way he started a career in derivatives trading!!! Before ever going Internet technology pioneer. He had some very interesting, wise, and inspirational things to say. But those are no fun to comment on, I want to disagree with him on something. He showed us a curve, it looked like a half of one of these. It was a plot of the adoption of facebook and he said that he sees no sign of it stopping – ever. I don’t have an exact quote, however he inferred that you could extrapolate the Facebook future usage from this chart (without ever having a problem) using a second order polynomial. I want to make it clear he made no reference to polynomials, I’m using this as a metaphor for his subtle inferrences. This is where I was like, “All trends end”. And you know why this trend is going to end is because the facebook UI is becoming cluttered while one by one I’m hearing people realize: “facebook is a waste of time” or “facebook it’s starting to feel creepy”. The thing is, social networking won’t end, it’s here to stay. It’s a great tool. However the technology will evolve and new players will enter. I bet nobody saw the end of ICQ coming (at least in Ontario) however their UI was simple and effective at first, then it got cluttered with features – people moved to MSN (at least in Ontario). Rinse and repeat, MSN is getting cluttered as people move to g-talk. I wonder if google will screw up a good thing with too many extra features – oh wait, didn’t they just “improve” the emoticons. I hear the sound of water whirling around and down – that’s g-talk’s eventual demise coming in 5 or 6 years. Of course this depends on the ramp up of complete adoption. Then again maybe google will continue to innovate as well as keep all their UI’s simple.

Lots of people think up stuff and name a “Law” after themselves. Look at Fitt. One day, when I have more free time, I’m going to try to create The McLarty’s Law of UI evolution: user interfaces are born simple, and die complicated. Those words are mine. Copywrite that, right now, where is my copywriting machine.