The Globe & Mail has some great charts out today.
I’m not supposed to copy them, for now, they are available here.
One shows the price of Canadian homes in the 5 major cities plotted against the “average worst 9 US cities” from 1997 to today. Assuming, what they mean is “average worst [performing] 9 US cities [by price, since the peak]“.
The US cities tripled (+200%) in 9 years. The same group is now up only +80% in 13.5 years.
Calgary took 12 years to triple. Calgary is now up only 175% in 13.5 years. So, Calgary, the #1 performing city, experienced a slower climb, and in the long-run out performed.
The rest of the cities are all individually at all-time highs, up between 85% and 135% since 1997.
To review, some facts:
- The best 5 performing Canadian cities have climbed higher with less volatility than the worst performing 9 US cities in 13.5 years.
- 9 cities in the US were more volatile collectively, than any single Canadian city over a 13.5 year span.
- In causal linear systems, overshoot is correlated to undershoot.
Perhaps both systems are going to oscillate towards a steady state. Doubt that. But the largest 9 US cities do have 24.45M people. Canada’s top 9, have 16.2M. My point there, is by population we still have a long way to go before being compared to the American market.
And, how insulting to compare my nations top 5 cities, to the worst 9 in America. I don’t know which cities were included in ’the worst’, but does Toronto really compare to Detroit, New York? Does Vancouver really compare to Las Vegas, Los Angelas? Does Montreal really compare to Miami?
Like my title suggests, I do have a contrarian signal for the bears to mull. Of the 106 comments posted to the Globe & Mail article, I counted bullish and bearish posts. 71.4% were bearish. That’s bullish. It’s those 71.4% of people, who will be bidding on any dip in prices.
Long the Loonie. Long Canadian Real-Estate. Long Canada.