Archive for March, 2008

Rates of Return?

Sunday, March 23rd, 2008

Friends, kindly answer the following, I’m curious:

1. What is your minimal acceptable rate of return, annually, pre-tax? (for those who don’t know, a MARR is what you would use to discount your own cashflows.  That is, what is money worth to you?)

2. In the following statement, what is X, Y, and A, B?

“I think, for the general public, it would take a new, green, fund runner X years returning greater than Y percent per year (after fees, and pre-tax) for most people to invest with him. And A years at B percent for me to invest.”

You don’t have to read on…in order to answer.  My answer is below.  Also, sorry, I’m going to get Disqus soon.

Personally, I’d never put anybody else in charge of my money – but if his track record was greater than 35% in bear and bull markets for +5 years, I’d be trying to learn from him, and considering investing.  I think the general public just wants a lack of volatility, as well as a good track record, I’d guess it would take +14% for 5 years for the general public.

I’m going to be ripped away from being able to spend ~10 hours / day on the stock market, in July.  I’m looking for a way to concentrate less on the markets, and still see higher than my MARR (minimal acceptable rate of return), 18%.  I believe I’ve found my strategy that I’m going to put to work, and test out. 

I’ve been really looking, and considering the permutations of a buy-write strategy combined with a derivative market making algorithm using SSO (double long the S&P). By the numbers, and using the last 25 years as history, it looks really easy to make +20% (almost guaranteed), and likely to see rates consistently as high as +35% annually.  Since it’s a buy-write, it’s by definition, less volatile.

Eg.

Let’s say I spend $50K, leveraged 1:1.2, so @ $66.40, I can buy 900 shares (1.2 x $50K = $60K to spend)

Wait patiently at the ask, trying to sell the $69 September calls for $7.70.  Given the average year the S&P has returned +10%, for the last 25 years, in the long run, it’s likely to see a 2% rise in 6 months, and the shares get called away.  (2% on the S&P will yield approximately 4% on SSO).  If that happens, the profit is $10.30 per share, or $9270.  After subtracting interest to borrow the leverage, it yields a return a little under 17% in 6 months.  Add a market making algorithm to capture the spread on the calls, and it bumps up the return quite a bit.  Then annualize  it, and…well…wow.  Of course, the last 6 months, this strategy would have been brutal, but the covered calls would have cushioned the losses greatly to a little less than brake even – hopefully.

Thoughts?

*Shakes Head*

Saturday, March 22nd, 2008

This is funny, overheard at western. It’s sad, it does nothing about the stereotype that is Western University.  I’ve never been a believer in stereotypes, after all, they are derived from the wisdom of the masses.  When I came to Waterloo, I remember walking around in first year, I noticed so many kids making reference to jokes about the natural log, electrons, and things that were non-linear.  We would get drunk and wonder about funny names for molecules, or get even more drunk and talk then fight about the differences between statics and statistics (of course both were slurred, after we smelled a few beer caps)…and my personal favorites included all discussions and references to random rates of change.  Within weeks of first year, I knew I was going to enjoy my stay at Waterloo.  And, I wouldn’t have changed them for the world.  It’s been fun.  33 days and counting until finals are over…almost half a decade later.

Right, Wrong, & Long

Thursday, March 20th, 2008

I went long, highly leveraged gold, early 2007 – got out when we breached $950/oz, a week or two ago. A few days early, but still not bad.  Smarter men called a local top better than I, which was only 2 or 3 days later.  I proved to myself that it’s actually possible to triple your money in less than a year, but it’s NOT for the faint of heart.  I won’t likely won’t ever try again, my life has been a mess watching and following it. I say that, but I’m a bit of an adrenaline junkie (not a cowboy, there’s a difference) so I’m probably not being completely honest.

The play is a story to tell, and one can quickly look back at the headlines.  I was long Northern Orion 2010 warrants, they turned into Yamana 2010 warrants.

I can’t stress this observation enough;  I’ve noticed for a few years now, the last 2 weeks of December, and the first 2 weeks of January, everybody and there dog, comes out with predictions for the year.  When there is a consensus amongst the predictions – jump on it, because the market will make it happen.  The prediction this year was $1000/oz in 2008…it’s only march and we already saw it come true.  I also twittered that I’m shorting puts in Yamana a bit ago, I went short July $19 puts for $2.50.  It turned out-bad timing, but I’m not leveraged, I’m long. It’s because I still think there’s upside ahead of this short term pull-back.  There’s a difference between being 3:1 bullish, and 1:1 bullish.

I also have had a horrible call.  Sandvine, which I’m sadly holding…but I knew getting in it’s a 10 year story - so I’m giving it +10 years. I’m down pretty big right now. I have faith in Waterloo.  I have faith that the Internet is growing too fast, and solutions need to be sold to fix it, I hope Sandvine steps up as a leader.  That’s all I’m doing – hoping, is that smart – probably not.  Should I have sold with profits a long time ago – yes.  Live and learn.

I’m now calling, and re-iterating that we’re seeing a market bottom here real soon.  Ie, sometime in the next month or so, if not already behind us (this week).  Good stocks are getting cheap, we’re going to capitulate, but I see a light at the end of the tunnel – and a bull is on it’s way.  Smart men a buying.  Buffet just made his largest purchase of his own stock, which is essentially a hand-picked S&P. One fund runner I know is launching a new billion dollar fund starting in May.  He picked may, to fix his broken rep.

Businesses Built on Eyeballs, Disqus, Concentration of Value, Context vs Content

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

I’m just an observer in the space, for now…but an economist I know made me question the thesis behind those investing in businesses with only vague plans for revenue under the presumption that “money follows eyeballs”.There has got to be an upper bound to the number of businesses that can survive solely based on eyeballs.  I mean, yah, if you can create something with unique content – user created or otherwise – you’re off the to races, and if people have to check it multiple times per day “let me get my check book, i’ll invest in that” is what I would have said days ago.  Now, I’m not so sure.  There is a finite supply on eyeballs, and an ever growing supply of places to point a browser.  I know the internet is growing way too fast, and I’m long that, but we’re becoming a nation of A.D.D. . Unless we all keep with the trend of sleeping less and less, businesses that require eyeballs to sustain revenue could be in for trouble, or at least, stiff competition.

Twitter is threatening the dot com like multiples given to Facebook’s revenue, just because every twitter user, likely checks there facebook, a little less.  Do you see what I’m getting at?

I can’t help but comment on this, with respect to one specific new idea, Disqus.  Some really sharp dudesI know are investing in it.  That’s different, it’s more of a service.  It’s not in the same league as other web services, and it’s not like a widget, it’s different and unique. All I know is it’s a very different model than single dot com ideas. I’d be long if I could. But, I have to say, I see trouble for their revenue.  I’m also not so sure the idea to ‘follow’ is as portable to disqus.  I have yet to use the feature they likely worked hard to program.  I mean, am I really going to read a stream of comments, that are likely fragments of conversations?  I guess I might, if people started commenting in proper English and full sentences, without using “that” or “it” referencing something in the original blog post.  But it’s likely my eyeballs will steer towards things with a bit more value than a bunch of half conversations.  But then again, it’s funny how people I know, like Donna, who have told me, “they are too busy to blog”. Her Disqus comment thread looks like the formation of a blog to me, since she writes in full sentences. If they changed the UI, they could make it more useful, but that applies to almost everything in the field of technology.   Don’t get me wrong I LOVE DISQUS, I don’t have to list the great features, you know them.  I just have beef with the ‘follow’ idea, and all I’m saying is, I hope that’s not what they are counting on driving revenue.

Disqus will be interesting to watch develop. And of course, I wish nothing but the best for KBC partners and Union Square Ventures.  Likely Disqus does just fine.  But to the rest of the eyeball chasers – I wish you all the best of luck, I think you’ll need it!

These, are just my humble thoughts, and I’m relatively uninformed about the supply and demand of eyeballs as well as growth patterns in the space, specifically in a quantitative sense.

One more thing, I want to say, concentration of value, is something that will make businesses built on eyeballs succeed.  The higher the concentration of value, in both the advertising that monetizes a service, and the information displayed to the user, is something I believe in.  As the world gets busier and busier, we need to optimize our usage of the one thing that is seemingly infinite, but is inherently not, TIME.  That’s why I think the trend in RSS readers is just the tip of the ice berg.  Ask the average person – “what’s RSS?” they couldn’t tell you, but they recognize that little orange icon…and it’s something “they’ve been meaning to look into”. For the same reason, that is, concentration of value, I believe content ads are the next big thing. That is, it’s going to take contextual based advertising down a peg.  I know Fraser thinks personalization and memory are what contextual advertising really need, but I think it will just delay the looming success of content ads.  Publishers will reap the rewards, advertisers will do the same, and so will the user.  Win, Win, Win.

2008 Economic Predictions: By Other People

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008

I’m so pumped to be working at Deloitte, here take a look at their 2008 Economic Predictions.  It was published in January, but the year’s not over, even if everything is coming true already – it’s still cool.  I’m going to be working right along similar teams working on similar stuff.   Also, I guess this is worth sharing in the same post, I picked up this months ago: 10 2008 Pridiction.

3/4 point cut – Intraday Reflections

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008

I couldn’t not watch the action today.  I swear I’m taking the next few days off from the markets – it has been intense.  I need to catch my breath and it’s only Tuesday.

I got out of SSO for a nice quick buck, shortly after the open today, I didn’t think we’d see any higher levels after the FED.  I really felt, so did dogwood, that the market was going to sell off if we didn’t see the full point.  I tweeted, the markets had an 84% chance of a full basis point cut.  Markets were violent, but  bounced back to the previous highs for the day – so I guess our logic was off.  Live and learn.

Don’t get me wrong, soon I’m going to go long SSO, for the long haul.  First little sign of real strength.  Could be soon.  Could me months.

Predictions (I’m a Perma Bull Desperate For a Bottom)

Monday, March 17th, 2008

I’m long stuff, stuff I should have sold. I want to believe in present value.

I’m desperate to call a bottom, I want one so bad. I just about can’t take it anymore – That’s bullish. But this market is insane right now. No confidence in anything. As ‘they’ say, when there is blood in the streets, buy Real Estate. Right now I say – there’s bears on the street, GET OUT THE TRAPS! There is no metaphoric value there, don’t try to find it, sorry for wasting your time.

Here are those asinine predictions:

1. The FED gets the Samurai swords out (duh this is almost guaranteed now…why is this even a point…you should move onto the next one…the market should NOT rally on this, but it will since people are dumb)

AND

2. The lows, put in sometime this week, on the S&P 499 holds until I can’t remember this post.

AND

3. That same Standard End Poor turns out to make us End Rich; we see 1600 before I get married.

AND

4. Lehman Bros. is the LAST bank that bends over, and takes it, in 2008.

Basically…I want to see CL be turned into CS.

I got an idea, just for fun, I’m going to make Andy a one way bet. I know he’ll take it. If all of my dumb predictions come true, I’ll send him a bottle of bourbon. If not, oh well, he’ll drink his own bourbon.

By the way, lets cross our fingers for Thiago Avila, who after a 2 day interview, may or may not get a job offer at Morgan Stanley…now…since he’s likely competing with a bunch of ex-BSC owners. But not too hard, cause Microsoft still has a go at him in an interview this Thursday – GOOD LUCK BUD! Whoa just realized it’s MS vs MS.

Disclosure – Way Long AVLA, buying SWAN on dips haha.

Internet Polls have Great Value: Results on Bear Stearns & More

Sunday, March 16th, 2008

I can’t wait to have a large enough network to harvest the wisdom of crowds on command. Those who have it, have earned it. Kudos.

So…to summarize the preliminary results of this poll (the first 11 comments).

Looks like nobody who voted thinks Bear Stearns is going to stay independent. And the leaders like Mathew & Peter think, there is a moral flaw in the fabric of humanity if they survive because of the fed. I concur. The rest of the results don’t surprise me.

1. 0% of voters think Bear Stearns will stay independent

2. 40% of voters think february lows will hold

3. 37.5% of voters think the fed will cut 1 full point.

4. 66.7% of voters think the market will close higher on Friday than Monday.

I broke answers down into boolean, that is, yes or no. Anybody that was wishy washy or qualitative without specifically answering, was not included for that single question. I’ll update this post when more people comment…I love analytics.

Disclosure – Long LDZN (Find out what this means)

Go Long a Person – Watch What Happends

Sunday, March 16th, 2008

One person asked me what it means to be long a person. I take it quasi seriously, and of course joke when I mention “disclosure” hahah, but people should not confuse it with fan-boyism. All it means is I invest my time in listening to what that person has to say. It means I hope to one day see a return. That’s present value. Of course, I’m not necessarily looking for fiscal return, nor any returns directly from that specific person. Like, I’m not looking for favors. I hope you get it.

It means I may share their wisdom from time to time, because I want others to also have the choice of investing in the same ideas I invest in. If I’m the first to own a good stock, I normally tell people about it. That’s the flow of information. I’m also long that. I’ve been buying BFIT, DAD, SPRT for years, I’m way green on those. I’ve also been buying LDZN since 2007. And I’m starting to build positions in WLSN and SWAN. One more thing, I think most investors realize that shareholders have a priority. If people understand that I’m investing my time in them, they might be more likely to share even more valuable things – which results in the metaphoric version of a share holder dividend…hahaha.

By the way my IPO is scheduled for April 2008. Pre-sale has already started, see JEFM for more details. hahaha.

US Demographics Plus Flash

Sunday, March 16th, 2008

Everybody who knows me, knows how much I dig demographics.  I found this interactive flash map of the US census data, through Max’s site, while it might be nothing new, it’s new to me.  I’m adding it to my fun links, scroll way down.

Networking & More In the 21st Century and beyond

Saturday, March 15th, 2008

Warning: It’s real late, and you should read the entire thing, before thinking less of me.

I wonder what it’ll be like 50 years from now?

Right now…

Everything is digital. Everything exists permanently. Everybody consumes more information than they used to. Everybody knows more people.

The revolution of the flow of information is upon & behind us. The leaders have already embraced it. We’re in the second half of a bubble where the laggards are joining the revolution. Now we have to all learn how to exist within it. The leaders that were hear first, will reap and leverage rewards in the form of capitalist and non-fiscal present value. Innovation and entrepreneurial endeavors are accelerating with the flow of information. So fast, I can feel it whizzing past me. It’s chilling to be part of it. I’m so glad I am.

Seriously, don’t shoot the guy trying to be poetically full of nauseating foresight, but everything I said is true. There are still people I know, who don’t realize it. So I wrote the above, even tho others have said before me, but just in my own (nauseating) words haha!

In 50 years, am I going to be jacked in so much that when my friend buys a stock, I’ll get the choice whether or not I want to execute a market order at the same instance? Will people complain about SPAM in their neural networks? Will fuzzy logic be more common place than digital? Side note – there’s an idea – a fuzzy blog theme. I’m not talking about hair, if you’re not a geek, it’s too hard to explain. When are we going to be able to search by pixel instead of strings? And when are true, large scale, social network collaborative tools going to actually be efficient? Or how about the evolution of the IDE – no more text based code, not even image based. I want a thought based software development platform. That’s right, they will likely have to move way past gesture based input, and figure out thought based user input methods first. Oh, that will be a fluffy field – User Centered Thought Based Design.

But what is 50 years going to bring to networking? They say there is 6 degrees of separation between any two people on earth, but that shrinking. Surely there is an upper bound to the number of people a sane (productive) person can follow on twitter. But thousands of followers means degrees of separations are shrinking.

How can I participate in this shrinking world while leveraging my youth? By doing what I’m doing(?) – Talking to myself – haha!

Disclosure – I’m already long the flow of information

What a Waste of Time, Some Might Say, Useless as Tits on a Bull

Saturday, March 15th, 2008

I’m glad I’m not popular enough to have ever been in a blog fight. They look exhausting. I’ve only witnessed two up until now, and I’ll admit, I almost started one myself, a while back, until I cooled off. But, I just about joined in the fun moments ago, about to side with Ingram – Simply because I like Matt and I like Howard. When really, I had no business doing that, I haven’t read everything about the fight. So, instead, I refrained and thought, the first time I find myself in a blog fight, or want to join one, I swear I will just surf away. The only thing I will do is keep posting links, to this very post instead of making arguments. Whoever I’m arguing with, I’ll waste there time, with confusion and anxiety. Because, It’s a waste of everybody’s time. No matter what anyone on the Internet is fighting about, chances are, it’s just two different opinions until it gets personal. Stop hating folks, use your time more constructively. Just stop.

What provoked this is me reading a tweet, from Howard, with a negative comment with respect to Duncan. Then I read half of what he had to say on the link through. I’m purposely not liking to Howard’s negative tweet, because it wasn’t actually part of the fight which spawned Ingram’s pretty well structured, and likely right on the money, post – but, I admit, I don’t know the entire story, likely nobody does. Of course I had to check out Duncan’s site…I got half way down the first or second paragraph of his March 15th post, when he wrote about Bull Tits. That’s when I stopped.

Duncan referred to something, I can’t even remember what, as “useless as tits on a bull”. That’s when I remembered my boss at Zehrs, way back when I was 15 calling one of my co-workers that very same thing “useless as tits on a bull”. My boss liked to swear at everything, tell racist jokes, and was generally disliked. Causality or Correlation? You decide. He jumped up and down, pissed off about everything, most of the time. He was wrong more often then he was right, that was part of the problem. It wasn’t his fault, he was divorced and uneducated. That statement “useless as tits on a bull” is exactly my point, and a sign of things getting out of control. The statement, if used derogatorily (is that a word – I don’t care), is ironically less useful than whatever it’s attempting to call useless. Same goes for pretty much all other profanity. Even if the target of any such derogatory metaphor is extremely useless, or some other form of negativity, it [the statement] does no good, and adds no value. The statement, profanity in general, and blog fights have something in common.

Note: If you’re reading this, and it’s not March 2008, it means it’s the future now, and I’ve stumbled into a blog fight with you or someone you know. I am directing you to this link, so I don’t have to waste my time reading whatever personal attacks or other well thought out highly verbose debate you are part of. That’s right, it’s a premptive blog post and argument, so I don’t have to waste any more of my future time. This post is an investment. That’s present value.

We are lucky to be blessed with the ability to share information through the internet, don’t let humanity screw it up, the same way we abuse everything else we’re given. Eg. A diverse planet.

By the way, the other blog fight was between Julia and some random guy. It was a waste of time too. But to myself, I sided with Julia, but refrained from participating – cause I didn’t know the entire story.

Also, everyone should be careful what they call useless, if you read this post carefully, I didn’t call blog fights useless. I did call them a waste of time – because there are more optimum ways one can spend there time. Like vacationing, right Matt? Hope you’re having fun in Florida bud.

And They Say the Consumer is Dead

Friday, March 14th, 2008

The only thing America has left to sell the rest of the world is it’s flare.  The blood of American icons and fads will be the exports for years to come.  Case study 1: All rolled up into one nice blog and T-shirt company.  That’s right, the front door of this “multi-million” dollar enterprise is a blog.  Filled with stories, inside jokes, cool pictures, communication to customers and ads for their products.  You can get a lesson in marketing, margin, costumer satisfaction & branding power all from somebody that inspires and somehow makes me want to spend $38.99 + shipping and handling to Canada for a T-shirt: Johnny Cupakes

He says he “won’t sell out” but I’m looking forward to the IPO. Sooner the better.