Archive for February, 2008

Events

Thursday, February 28th, 2008

My portfolio is doing great today, compared to the market. Big wins from AAPL, and CCJ, everything else I own is beating the market and either brake even or slightly red. I’m off to Toronto’s Royal York hotel tonight, for a social, which I am so pumped about. It’s the start of a 2 day interview process for an amazing opportunity I’m lucky to have. It’s ironic how this could be one of the culminating alterations of my future, and it’s happening on a day where two other huge events are kicking off. Two events I really wish I could attend. The main one I wish I could attend is TED, in Aspen. I hope I can go to both next year…or maybe the year after. I also want to get around to going to Woodstock for Capitalists sooner or later, and before Mr. Buffet retires. I realized, these events will likely sneak up on me, and i’ll forget about getting in on them. So I’m going to make a list of personal checkpoints, public, in my about page, sooner rather than later. I’m going to keep updating it as new things inspire me. So, the first three that I hope to be fortunate enough to one day attend is LP, TED, WS4C.

Trading Strategy: “Naked Short Selling Puts”

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

After Swan wrote about “Being the house”, it inspired me to want to leave a thread of this conversation in my blog, to live forever. He’s right. And young inexperienced traders don’t learn quick enough (I’ve watched my friends get burned trying to go long options, time and time again).

But here’s another spin on it, which I think smart investors will agree; naked shorting selling puts INSTEAD OF GOING LONG – rocks. Instead of buying the stock, I hid the bid, on the two or three strike, in the money, front month, puts. This essentially gets me “assigned” the stock later, at a cheaper price than the market would sell it to me at today. Of course, yah a quick move north in the stock will have me ticked off if I don’t get assigned, but manning my positions daily hopefully will compensate for this. Also, you don’t have to front the cash (right away). That means you can be more flexible and use a little margin (with caution) to scale into and out of positions. Essentially, say you know you want to sell stock XYZ and pick up some ABC, well you can short the puts on ABC, and potentially time your sale on XYZ a little better.

Obviously, you have to be careful, and not leverage yourself into naked short selling positions, cause that can be painful. You need to make sure you have the cash available when wicked witch switch day rolls around. But if you didn’t mind going long ABC at $50, you can short the $60 puts for $12, if it falls to $40 you would have lost $10 per share anyway. Shorting the puts, means you only lost $8.

Whenever you do this, it’s easier to tell people, you just “went long”.

Disclosure: Short ABC, and XYZ :P

The Web is Amazing, and Full of Potential & Abuse & Potential Abuse

Monday, February 25th, 2008

The internet is growing, exponentially, and so is the population, and so are the number of web pages, and so is the number of services, etc.  Go long Sandvine. Go long Google.  Demographics say so.  Indirectly Dr. K Foot says so.

Now I present a list, of stuff, I want to remember, and check in on in a few years which are all proof of the potential, abuse, and the potential abuse.

Eg 1. CouchSurfing

Eg 2. iJustine can instantly send a message to 65,000 people, and they will all (likely) read it.  Water finds it’s own level.  IE; you are who you follow.

Eg 3. PostSecret

Eg 4.  Reddit (this is nothing new, but a perfect example of potential that is abused, often.  My friend, Mr. Avila points it out here)

Eg 5. FreeRice

Eg 6.  SecondLife

Eg 7.  This guy – thinks he can sell 1 million pieces of “art”, because of the web.

Eg 8. DesignerCondoms found this on Julia’s site

Eg 9. ThisGuy – perfect example of abuse. He has a rank of 500K, I’m still at 3M.  There are something like 16M *.coms, so I’m doing okay, I guess.

Eg 10. RSS – I think it is STILL full of untapped potential. Everybody should learn how to use it (and share like I do). Again more information at accelerating rates of flow.  Only 5% of the internet use it, yet approximately 90% of the top 100K sites offer it. Another example of abuse of the web; I don’t have to give a reference for that.

Eg 11. I bought stock in this small little company, today. Maybe you heard of it, but chose today because of the web.  I had been considering purchasing GOOG for a while now.  By “a while” I mean weeks.  The demographics surrounding internet usage leave no guessing as to which direction growth in the space will occur.  While I was was considering picking up some shares anyway, today in my twitter feed, I see Fred Wilson saying he’s picking up shares.  I look at my watch list, it’s getting close to a 8 or 9 month low.  “He’s right”, I think to myself. Minutes later, Swan agreed with his purchase, and later in the day wrote this post.  All before 12:30.  12:36, Lindzon left a comment, saying he did the same.  I figure a) I liked the stock already and it was only a question of when not if and b) all of these gentlemen are more successful (more experienced, and older) than I, so count me in. And so, I bought at the close, and I thank them for letting me get the cheapest price :P .  Collectively, I wonder how big our purchase was, and how many sellers got to hit the bid because of Mr. Wilson.  That’s impact.  But it was in part because of the internet, and twitter, and the speed of information flowing that the three of us purchased stock today. So, I’m going to plan on holding GOOG for a very long time.  What a better stock to hold as an icon, than GOOG?

Was this post, and EG 11. an abuse of potential? No.

For the record,  before today, I have never made a purchase on some one else’s signal, but today – it felt ok.  I’m no follower.

Disclosure – Long Sandvine, Long GOOG, and long the flow.

Four dot coms and a Two Day Interview!

Saturday, February 23rd, 2008

Like the title suggests, I’ve got four and a half dot coms (I’m investing in them all personally, mostly just small bits of time and a little coin) AND a 2 day interview, kicking off at this place this Thursday. I’m so pumped. It’s important for me to point out, that the interview for a day job could crush these plans for these *.coms in a heartbeat. “Business Technology Analyst” – I will be so happy to get this job. If the cards don’t get delt in my favor, i’ll keep looking, but I’m keeping the bar for employers high.

The *.coms are secret, until I launch, because they are works in progress, and may or may not ever see the light of day. Except BlueMoat of course.

Here are some clues:

1. We’re going to take on the “review” market, with a product line that is cheap, where nobody is in the space yet, and in dire need of analytics. I just joined this great 3 person team. Ok, it’s likely to yield ~$10K – ~20K/ year in revenue for year 1, and year two looks like +$30K, but it’s a start. We’re looking for investors.

2. After hearing the Facebook guy talk about “Content” Ads, I had an idea, and am going to launch a prototype, to see how well it goes, or at least get myself a little of the action. I’m dumping $3K – $4K personally and probably 500 hours into this one (if I don’t land a great job soon) we’ll see where it takes me.

3. Currently, media is deemed “important” based on what gets eyeballs, and/or votes, from the masses. But the masses are not smart, that makes media dumb, and creates a dangerous cycle for humanity. I’ve got an idea to change that; it’s real simple, easy to build, cheap, just hard to get off the ground – because it desperately needs adopters for it to work. It will only catch on, if it has the support of bloggers. I’ll need a network of bloggers to help me spam the blog-o-sphere. E-mail me if you want a % of equity, if you’re blog is in the top 100,000 or has +20K readers. I’m giving away basis points of equity for various levels of support from popular blogs. Don’t look at me like I’m evil for wanting to recruit top bloggers and pay them off, when you finally hear my idea, you’ll be like “Wow, that will help the human race”.

4. I’ve got a unique idea that lets me personally invest in the personal branding idea happening all over the Internet. It’s going to be powerful, but REALLY hard to build, in terms of software. I’m leaving this one, until I have a little more time, and a little more capital…but I want to keep it at the back of my mind.

One last idea hit me today, which I have spent zero time on… www.CreateA – - – - – - – - – .com…the title says it all.

I’m looking for great people to help start these ideas.  I have a small team of local talent to recruit from, but the people I know all all Engineers, and just graduating school.  People like me. E-mail me, if you want more details, and have unique web start-up talents OR CAPITAL hehehe.

Newspond = Sexypond

Thursday, February 21st, 2008

I just caught wind of Newspond.  I think it’s their 3rd day running, and I’ve watched the number of stories “surface” climbing right before my very eyes.  It’s a good idea, but still a news source based on the masses opinion of what is “good” news.  The masses are not smart. But, I must say, these guys did a terrific job on the site design and graphics.  It is this.  If they “tweak” the algorithms right, it could be powerful.    I haven’t used it yet, but I did sign up for an account.  I wonder how much time they spent on this creation, like I’m talking man hours.   I want to partner with Ian or Chan for a project I have an idea for, but sigh…sadly now does everybody else on the Internet start-up front.

Good Job Boys, way to make an impact.

I’ll be checking in on the site and closely watching the Alexa data, it should be interesting.

Hector the Projector!

Thursday, February 21st, 2008

Thiago Avila and I are building a Smart Projector for our final mechatronics project. We are going to measure with a web cam where the screen is using image detection techniques. Then, use a PSoC controller, RS232, the Cypress CY3210-EVAL1, a servo, some motors, some fans, a laptop, a fresnel, a very bright light & ballast, a special lens, and a LCD monitor he tore apart to build an auto-focusing, auto-keystone correcting, home made theatre system.

We named it Hector, The Projector. Stay tuned.

Interviewing, Recruiting & The Web

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

I’m going to add supporting evidence, as to how right on the money an article which has been recirculated and edited/updated in Business Week is, and also add value to the discussion, by adding a point they missed. It was an article on how social media, particularly blogs are changing the business world.

They failed to mention how blogs are changing the interview & recruiting process.

Employers have googled me, and my two blogs. I know because of web developer analytics. Links to my blog have been forwarded around offices in e-mails, again more data from stats. I know which employers spend time on my site, looking at me, and I know which ones don’t, and what posts they have read. Here’s a fun fact, I’ve applied to a job posting where they only want applicants to post a link to their blog, rather than a resume. These kinds of things have impact on decisions made in the recruiting process, and is likely effecting my career as a professional.

If an employer googles me, they will find I have a passion for stocks, an entrepreneurial flare, as well as enjoy writing, reading, and I’m about to graduate from Engineering at Waterloo. If they dig deep enough they will get to read my thoughts, on silly things as well as where else I have interviewed. I don’t care, I’m just being honest. Information is value. All recruiters and HR people should realize that in a formal interview people answer questions in a fashion that is more likely to get them hired. If you think about it, the process needs to be improved. It’s sort of like dating, but you have approximately an hour to decide if you want to date the person (for at least a few more months). And both sides are expected to make this decision quickly and by any means necessary.

Here’s a thought: I want an employer to know as much about me as possible, I don’t want them to make a mistake and hire me into a job where I’m a) not qualified b) won’t be good at or c) have to hide my personal life & interests.

So, I’m laying it out here, I’ve applied to jobs in finance mainly (research/analytical thinking), the Internet (some start-ups), technology (many many diverse jobs here) and others which I am really crossing my fingers for, like Deloitte. Some have been interesting, and some lame. Surprised? You shouldn’t be, I’m talented, educated, and could do many things in many fields, and be equally successful and happy doing them. I’ve only blogged about a fraction of the opportunities I applied to and interviewed for. Employers should be on this, I will when I do any interviewing. I’m waiting for a head hunter to reply to a comment on a post I write and offer me a job. It’s coming.

This next part is important, and leaders should realize this. If somebody is alive in North America and doesn’t have any tracks online, it can mean an array of possibilities (here are a few I could think of):

- They are terrified of stalkers (or the authorities)

- They are lame (ie have no thoughts, ideas, interests, etc.)

- They are liars (ie hide behind a fake profile name, and thus have something to hide)

Hears a tip to level the playing field, when you google them, add the location, or topic they might be found near.

To all employers that I have interviewed with, may one day interview with, or never will because of this: I’m just honest, and if you asked the right questions in an interview, I’d tell you the answers anyway. So in my next interview, just ask me, “What would I get if I googled you?”. Let’s not dance around the “who knows who or what about whom” in the next interview, okay. I promise I’ll ask you the same thing back, if you’re going to be my future boss that is.

Another thing, inferrences and assumptions based on online conversation which are normally rather poor writing, can lead to mistakes. So it’s probably best for both parties to clear up any uncertainty or misinterpretations you found by “digging around” google on your own.

Oh by the way, leaders are already taking this to the next step. I know for a fact, Microsoft and Amazon.com, take bloggers over non-bloggers to interview and then give them offers. I know many people who talk about various interviews they have been through. Some of them are on my blog roll.

I’m Going to Build Myself One of These

Monday, February 18th, 2008

A desk combined with a tread mill.

And i’m going to sell one to Andrew Teeple while I’m at it.

Multi-tasking is great.  It’s a really silly idea.  I love being dynamic. I love being productive.

Leading, Reading & Roman Like Success

Sunday, February 17th, 2008

It has hit me like a ton of bricks in the last few days as to one hypothesis why some groups of people are successful, and some aren’t.  I wish it had a less silly name associated with the theory, but it doesn’t:  Animal Spirits.   Please read this entire post, because I tie in RIM, the rise and fall of Rome, immigration, Google Reader, a couple millionaires I know, and the University of Waterloo all in one broken up thought to deliver a punch line and a message.

In Larry Smith’s economics class he discusses immigration with respect to the type of people that immigrate.  Picture this scene, in a third world country: 

“Hey Mr. A, this food sucks, I can’t get enough clean water, and I can’t feed my kids properly”. 
“Ok, Mr. B, let’s get out of here, I’m serious, I can’t take it, let’s pack our bags and take off”. 
“Maybe tomorrow Mr. A, I’m tired”. 
“Mr. B, I’m tired too, but I’m packing tonight, good-bye”. 

The point is, the people that don’t mind the uncertainty, the risk, they are the leaders. The entrepreneurial people don’t “Take it”.  They move, improve, innovate and think-outside the box.  This combined with geography and political laws create geographic sub-sets of culture where “Animal Spirits” exist in larger ratios forming pools of talent and leaders, leaving deficits behind from where they left.

I know many living examples of success, and likely you do too, and most stories start with “When they/she/he/I moved…”. My girlfriend’s father, he’s a leader, and a humble successful person who moved across the ocean decades ago to start a new life in North America.  Howard Lindzon, a Canadian who moved from Toronto to New York and/or Phoenix. It would take another 1000 words to describe him and his decisions towards success. But again more humble success, a leader with what seems like infinite ideas and entrepreneurial spirit.  My Uncle, left the quiet town of Ridgetown, Ontario for Alberta to pursue real-estate investments and eventually owned malls ahead of the boom out there.  He now moves condos like hotcakes in Hawaii, 10’s and 100’s at a time, it seems like.  Again, more humble success harvested from his ability to relocate geographically and unafraid of uncertainty.

The rise and fall of Rome supports this hypothesis too, so I’m told.  I’m no expert, but they conquered, explored, and learned at an uncanny rate compared to their peers in other lands.  They apparently laughed in the face of uncertainty, and were prepared to move geographically as they explored and conquered.  It’s likely debatable on how humble the Romans were but none the less it’s amazing what they accomplished.  The fall of Rome supports the theory too.  The fall began with triumphs from a really small group of barbarians that were sick of standing by and watching the success of their neighbors, so despite the barbarians own uncertainty they moved.

This happens on more local scales as well.  I had peers five years ago that chose their post secondary education based on several factors.  Some wanted certainty, both location and price, and chose the local school.  While some people chose Waterloo.  Why is Waterloo different than every other school?  The unique & mandatory co-op process.  It creates huge uncertainty, and the students accept it.  Students in Engineering at Waterloo have to complete 6, 4 month co-op terms.  They go through real, competitive interviews, where their fate is eventually left up to employer’s offers & ranking, and a computer algorithm that breaks ties.  That means, one night every four months, a large chunk of the students go to sleep unsure which employers will make offers and what the computer will spit out as matches.  They go to sleep not knowing what town or company they will be working in, or for, for 4 months of their future.  That’s character building, it’s humbling, and it’s largely filled with uncertainty.  So, you essentially have people that chose the path of uncertainty (that is, to come to Waterloo) that the co-op process brings.  I have to believe this is why Waterloo ranks so high in school rankings everywhere, and why employers come to Waterloo expecting the best.  They are unknowingly looking for talent, that selected themselves into a pool of made-to-order animal spirits.

One more example RIM:  Founded and built on the talent from the pool of Animal Spirits in Waterloo from people that moved from all over the world to get here.

An amazing book I just picked up links the themes of uncertainty and success, right down to zebras.   This may be just a poetic metaphor and biologically untrue, I have no idea, but apparently zebras move in heard and all individually have a choice.  The choice to pick where they each stand relative to the heard.  To stay in the middle of the heard means not getting enough fresh unstamped grass to eat nor making any decisions. While staying on the outside means getting the first bite of grass and potentially becoming lunch for a lion.  Think about it.  Think about the uncertainty and risk associated with the success of the Zebra standing on the edge of the heard vs. the middle of the heard.

So, with a new perspective on looking for traits that build success, you now have a gift from me to you, with which may come a realization and responsibility. If you’re now just realizing that you’re the type of person with Animal Spirit, that means you’re either already a leader, or about to become one.  Therein lies the responsibility, to lead.   I’m just saying this, because you need to be aware of the fact that you’re a leader, like it or not.  The list of responsibilities are not finite, and all surround the conscious decision to lead.  Please think about the impact of leading, to yourself for two minutes.    In case you need help realizing you’re a leader, read the next paragraph.  If you don’t, skip it.

If you’re a leader, you’re likely a contrarian.  You may or may not be mocked by others for thinking a little differently. You prefer to be known, rather than anonymous.  You’re busy.  You speak out, and speak up.  You communicate.  You learn.  You have energy and are driven.  You look for value.  You critique then create, rather than just critique.  You inform.  You don’t lean on people.  People lean on you.  You don’t mind being wrong, and can admit not knowing something.  You know things first.  You apologize and reflect upon wrong doing, but stand by your values. I hope this helps. These are just my observations.

Thanks for reading this far.   I’m done informing you now but while I have the attention of some leaders, I want to send a message: “keep reading, keep sharing, keep leading & realize the impact”.  The world will truly be a better place if leaders shared what they read with everybody, including other leaders.  To help with this, I like Google Reader, it lets you read, it lets you share what you read. All leaders should/will learn how to use RSS, efficiently.   This message stems on the idea of the responsibilities of leaders.  Think about the impact of news, media, and books.  Now realize, the masses are not leaders.  Imagine the difference we could make if the people with “Animal Spirit” had a bigger impact on the flow of information.   Google Reader, I believe, can put a tiny dent into making an impact like this.

Ok, I’m done, and thanks for hearing my two cents. 

Ever Heard of The Iron Ring?

Thursday, February 14th, 2008

After almost five years, I’m getting my iron ring tomorrow.  I’d like to inform the uninformed.  As well as being a symbol of authenticity, responsibility, intelligence and creativity it’s a reminder of the oath an engineer takes upon joining the brotherhood between all working Canadian Engineers.  I wish the world understood it better.  There are incorrect stereotypes I hear.  All anyone who is not an engineer should take away is, that anybody with a small plain, chamfered ring on their working hand’s pinky finger, is likely well educated in the sciences and wields slightly higher moral values with respect to most things that happen in the world.

Get a Brand, Get a Reader, Get a life(?)

Thursday, February 14th, 2008

I’ve said it before, and i’ll say it again; ”We’re in the middle of a revolution and information will never flow the same again”.  Of course I’m nowhere near the first to say this, I’m just a supporter.  Personal online branding is now officially a must.  If you’re building a brand that hides your complete identity, it’s just a lie, and a bad brand, in my humble opinion.   You have to be real folks.  If somebody was looking for information on you, they will find it. They could pursue two of many avenues – a google search, or straight up ask you.  If they use either venue, do you want to lie, or hide? Don’t hide, instead paint the entire picture.  More information, is more value.  If you want a richer (not just money), more interesting life: blog, twitter, tumbl, or pounce.   If you do, and take the big plunge of commiting to even weekly blogging, you’ll regret not starting sooner.  And for crying out loud, participate people, ADD to the conversation.  Don’t be a blog voyeur, blog authors aren’t talking asynchronously just to hear themselves think, most appreciate feedback.  I have (some) traffic, I can see the log.  Pleasse comment, contribute, and track-back…anything adds value.  All posts should be treated like an ice breaking conversation starter, and comments should reflect that.  The blog-o-sphere is growing, and here to stay.  So is RSS. You have to learn how to use this.

Oh, and if you don’t have a device connected to the net yet, take that ($$$) plunge while you’re at it, I like my Black Berry…but then again, I might be biased.

Disagree with me?  Please do! Add your two cents, there is a comment link below! 

Oh, and another thing, if you believe the internet is getting too big too useful too fast – go long Sandvine.  TSX: SVC.TO

Disclosure: Looking for a way to go long RSS…if I find one, I’m buying! Long Sandvine.

Wikinvest.com …my thoughts continued

Tuesday, February 12th, 2008

As I wrote yesturday, I had an interview at Wikinvest.com my post was “to be continued”.   Where was I, oh yah, I was in the middle of making a case for why the current wikinvest.com will likely be unsuccessful.   Basically, unless they have quite a few tricks up their sleeves, I don’t see it catching on (and being useful as it intended to be).

The reasons I have encompass two supporting statements; 1. I think I know the type of people that are likely to contribute, and they are few and far between, plus a rare breed. 2. I am the type of person likely to contribute.

Looking at part 1: People need to understand a wiki, I guess that population IS growing.  Wikipedia is proof.  But think about the intersection of that group of people that invest in stocks, then think about the number of investors that are willing to write for free, and have the time to do so (ie no money, fame, or for lack of a better word, want to win a game). It is the people that belong to this subset of the population that are going to contribute.  Then you have the fact that people also have to be willing to write about historic things, boring things, known things, and it of course would help if people held and followed a stock for longer than a year or two. 

There is a small problem with their current “ranks”, they are sortof flawed in terms of intrinsic motivation.  People can climb the ranks, and essentially “win” the game.  That is, people can accumulate points but once they have achieved “Sr. Director” status they have nowhere to go but down.  This is a minor detail, but in terms of user experience think of how depressing it will be for me to have been promoted to Sr. Associate, only to log in in 2 months and be demoted.  I won’t loose sleep over it.  Sure they can keep getting more points and appear to promote contributors, but they have placed a CAP by ranking the percentile of people and the levels they can achieve, then fall back to.  I think the majority of people will log in, contribute a few things on their favorite stocks and then get bored.  You can solve this demotion problem with one of these.

Also there is inevitably the problem of unreliable information…but that exists everywhere, so I can’t hold that against them too much.

Here’s a few ways they can improve:

1. Forward projections of earnings and cashflows – assign points to contributors for being close when the numbers come out.  People will keep coming back to add their predictions of the numbers, and see how close the site was to the results, it could truely become better than “analysts were expecting X cents per share”.

2. Upgrades and Downgrades.  Think Twitter + NewRatings.com.  Contributors could answer “I’m upgrading this stock because:” or “I’m downgrading this stock because:”  It would create a really quick view of the market thinking…plus people would start to feel bloggers guilt and a need to constantly contribute to the dynamic flow of information.

3. There are a bunch of problems usability wise.  You can fix them by putting a good team together.

4. Have an IPO section, information on IPO’s are hard to collect, and people could actually use a resource like this.

5. Show a list of stocks people are “searching for” and “contributing to”, and weight the list by complete/incomplete information.   Call them “Ideas”.  A dynamic feed of the stocks that people want information on, plus want to write information on, and where they don’t have information. The last contraint is the most important to sift out AAPL.  For instance, I think an algorithm like this, could point to ideas like DRYS, CROX, or MON…BEFORE they become over-valued.

6. A blog badge (duh?) – “I’ve been promoted to SENIOR ASSOCIATE…and all I get is the intrinsic satisfaction, I want to put it on my BLOG man!”

The bottom line is in it’s current state, it’s dead in the water, but likely just as I have ideas, so do they.  I think with the right marketting and innovation, Wikinvest.com could be really great.  I’ll be watching.

I’ve become a Sr. Associate…at Wikinvest…why it will fail

Monday, February 11th, 2008

So, I had an interview the other day at Wikinvest.com …it went horrible.  I completely bungged up.  I’ll never hear from them.  Oh well, there are tons of things wrong with this unlikely success story.  I was hoping they would hire me, and I could fix that for them…but they wanted a coder…I wanted a more challenging/interesting role, so by the end of the hour long phone interview, I think we both new my chances, were quickly approaching the limit of 1/t, as t goes to infinite (If you don’t know the answer, see this). 

They have 10 employees, and enough users to almost cover the S&P 500 stocks.  I seriously wanted to cut and paste my morningstar subscription content, but instead I attempted to write.  It’s hard to spew out everything you know about a company you’ve invested in for years…try it…it’s hard to pen.  Ideally, they would have every stock covered like AAPL, but that’s unlikely considering this quick math / thought process / estimating / considerations:

1. The number of people that know how to use a wiki is few.

2. The number of people that want to write about stocks for free are a rare breed.

3. The number of people invested in any given stock, and long enough to care about it, is a finite number.

4. The information they will database is all available via other means, will be stale, baked into any stock, and possible incorrect/incomplete.

…this post is To Be Continued.